Chapter

Conclusion

Aruna Sathanapally

in Beyond Disagreement

Published in print October 2012 | ISBN: 9780199669301
Published online January 2013 | e-ISBN: 9780191744648 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669301.003.0011
Conclusion

Show Summary Details

Preview

Institutional design is generally unpredictable until tried, perhaps even repeatedly tried, and this is one reason why test cases are valuable. This chapter captures the main conclusions of this book’s investigation into the innovation of declarations of incompatibility (DOIs). Drawing lessons for institutional design to support a deliberative democracy, the author argues that it is useful to think of DOIs in terms of mechanisms of ‘institutional design writ small’, for seemingly small matters of design can be significant to better realising democratic values and human rights protection.

Keywords: institutional design; constitutional design; reasonable disagreement

Chapter.  2669 words. 

Subjects: Human Rights and Immigration

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.