Moral Error Theory and the Belief Problem

Jussi Suikkanen

in Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 8

Published in print July 2013 | ISBN: 9780199678044
Published online September 2013 | e-ISBN: 9780191757457 | DOI:

Series: Oxford Studies in Metaethics

Moral Error Theory and the Belief Problem

Show Summary Details


Moral error theories claim that (i) moral utterances express moral beliefs, that (ii) moral beliefs ascribe moral properties, and that (iii) moral properties are not instantiated. Thus, according to these views, there seems to be conclusive evidence against the truth of our ordinary moral beliefs. Furthermore, many error theorists claim that, even if we accepted moral error theory, we could still in principle keep our first-order moral beliefs. This chapter argues that this last claim makes many popular versions of the moral error theory incompatible with the standard philosophical accounts of beliefs. Functionalism, normative theories of beliefs, representationalism, and interpretationalism all entail that being sensitive to thoughts about evidence is a constitutive feature of beliefs. Given that many moral error theorists deny that moral beliefs have this quality, their views are in a direct conflict with the most popular views about the nature of beliefs.

Keywords: metaethics; moral error theory; belief; fictionalism; moral psychology; doxastic involuntarism; functionalism; Mackie; cognitivism and non-cognitivism

Chapter.  12123 words. 

Subjects: Metaphysics

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.