Joshua K. Swift, Jennifer L. Callahan and Barbara M. Vollmer

in Psychotherapy Relationships That Work

Second edition

Published in print April 2011 | ISBN: 9780199737208
Published online May 2011 | e-ISBN: 9780199894635 | DOI:

Show Summary Details


Client preferences are recognized as a key component to evidence-based practice; however, research has yet to confirm the actual influence preferences have on treatment outcome. In this meta-analysis, this chapter summarizes results from thirty-five studies that have examined the preference effect with adult clients. Overall, clients who were matched to their preferred therapy conditions were less likely to drop out of therapy prematurely (OR = .59, p 〈 .001) and showed greater improvements in treatment outcomes (d = .31, p 〈 .001). Type of preference (role, therapist, or treatment type) was not found to moderate the preference effect, but study design was found to be a significant moderator, with RCTs showing the largest differences between preference-matched and nonmatched clients. These results underscore the centrality of incorporating patient preferences when making treatment decisions. Clinical examples and therapeutic practices are provided.

Keywords: preference; meta-analysis; evidence-based practice; client variables; meta-analysis; therapy relationship

Chapter.  7951 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Clinical Psychology

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.