Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment

Franklin G. Miller and Robert D. Truog

in Death, Dying, and Organ Transplantation

Published in print October 2011 | ISBN: 9780199739172
Published online January 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780199918683 | DOI:
Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment

Show Summary Details


A traditional norm of medical ethics is that doctors must not intentionally cause the death of their patients. However, withdrawing life-sustaining treatment has become a common practice in hospital intensive care units. This practice has been made consistent with the traditional norm by means of the conventional view in medical ethics that withdrawing life support allows the patient to die but does not cause death. In this chapter we challenge this conventional view. Adopting a common-sense conception of causation, we argue systematically that withdrawing life-sustaining treatment, such as mechanical ventilators, causes death. In addition, we argue that causing death by stopping life support is typically an intentional act. Nevertheless, causing death by withdrawing life-sustaining treatment is justified because it respects the self-determination and promotes the well-being of patients. The argument in Chapter 1 sets the stage for discussing the ethics of medical acts that cause death in subsequent chapters.

Keywords: withdrawing life-sustaining treatment; killing; allowing to die; causation; intention; moral bias

Chapter.  11808 words. 

Subjects: Moral Philosophy

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.