Active Euthanasia

Franklin G. Miller and Robert D. Truog

in Death, Dying, and Organ Transplantation

Published in print October 2011 | ISBN: 9780199739172
Published online January 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780199918683 | DOI:
Active Euthanasia

Show Summary Details


Conventional medical ethics relating to end-of-life decisions draws two bright lines between ethically permitted and forbidden practices. Clinicians may withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment but must never administer lethal treatment. Additionally, palliative care that relieves suffering, even at the risk of hastening death, is permitted, but active euthanasia is forbidden. Drawing on the argument in Chapter 1, we reject both of these bright lines. It does not follow that these end-of-life practices are morally equivalent. Patients have a right to decide to withdraw life support and a right to receive palliative care; they have no right to receive lethal treatment. We argue that contrary to the traditional view, active euthanasia as a treatment of last resort is compatible with the role morality and the professional integrity of physicians. However, it raises complex issues of policy that make it an open question as to whether this practice should be legally permitted.

Keywords: active euthanasia; goals of medicine; role morality and professional integrity; palliative care; slippery slope

Chapter.  12211 words. 

Subjects: Moral Philosophy

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.