Refusing the Turn

John Perry

in The Pretenses of Loyalty

Published in print July 2011 | ISBN: 9780199756544
Published online September 2011 | e-ISBN: 9780199897407 | DOI:
Refusing the Turn

Show Summary Details


Despite the turn to loyalty made by some recent liberal theorists and the analogous turn made by the early Locke, some today persist in denying the problem of doing so. There are at least two ways in which one might refuse the practical implications of the turn to loyalty. First, one might deny that such obligations and identities are in any way a challenge to political life because they can be privatized without remainder. This can be called Jeffersonian separatism of a naïve sort. Second, one might refuse the turn to loyalty in the opposite direction: All “good Americans” share a common morality that is by definition perfectly compatible with Christianity and should be accepted by all people of goodwill and right reason. Those who refuse the turn to loyalty in this way can be called Lockean natural lawyers. Examples of each are examined.

Keywords: Kramnick; Moore; West; Jefferson; Jeffersonian separatism; natural law; Locke; religious Right; secular Left; secularism

Chapter.  10919 words. 

Subjects: Religious Studies

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.