Chapter

Useful Instrument of Government

Mel A. Topf

in A Doubtful and Perilous Experiment

Published in print September 2011 | ISBN: 9780199756766
Published online January 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780199918898 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756766.003.0004
Useful Instrument of Government

Show Summary Details

Preview

Defenses of advisory opinions came only after the attacks, and after the advising justices developed restrictions on advising. Surprisingly, the defenses have rarely responded to the attacks, largely ignoring such challenges as separation of powers and due process. This chapter discusses the chief defenses, including advisory opinions as a remedy for the purported delay and inefficiency of judicial review. This issue made a national appearance during the New Deal era, when several proposals were introduced in Congress to amend the U.S. Constitution to require the U.S. Supreme Court to give advisory opinions, to stop New Deal legislation from being declared unconstitutional after being enacted and put into effect, as had happened several times. Other defenses discussed include the expertise of the judges and interbranch cooperation, a major principle of the Progressive era, whose intellectual leaders downplayed constitutional values such as separation of powers.

Keywords: advisory opinions—defenses; judicial review; New Deal era; progressive era; separation of powers; due process; interbranch cooperation

Chapter.  16052 words. 

Subjects: Constitutional and Administrative Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.