Chapter

The Providential Usefulness of “Simple Foreknowledge”

Dean Zimmerman

in Reason, Metaphysics, and Mind

Published in print February 2012 | ISBN: 9780199766864
Published online May 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780199932184 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199766864.003.0016
The Providential Usefulness of “Simple Foreknowledge”

Show Summary Details

Preview

There are two ways to combine the doctrine of complete divine foreknowledge with the philosophical thesis of libertarianism (i.e., that freedom and determinism are incompatible): Molinism (which requires the truth of what Plantinga has called “counterfactuals of freedom”) and simple foreknowledge (which does not). David Hunt has ably defended simple foreknowledge against its many critics; and he has claimed that God would have more providential control over the course of history if simple foreknowledge were true than if open theism were true (i.e., than if God did not know the outcomes of free choices until they happened). I develop a framework for describing different views about the “stages” in complete divine foreknowledge, and examine the providential advantages Hunt describes.

Keywords: foreknowledge; libertarianism; free will; providence; David Hunt

Chapter.  12511 words. 

Subjects: Metaphysics

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.