Necessity, Certainty, and the a Priori

Albert Casullo

in Essays on a Priori Knowledge and Justification

Published in print February 2012 | ISBN: 9780199777860
Published online May 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780199933525 | DOI:
Necessity, Certainty, and the a Priori

Show Summary Details


Empiricist theories of knowledge are attractive, for they offer the prospect of a unitary theory of knowledge based on relatively well understood physiological and cognitive processes. Mathematical knowledge, however, has been a traditional stumbling block for such theories. There are three primary features of mathematical knowledge that have led epistemologists to the conclusion that it cannot be accommodated within an empiricist framework: (1) mathematical propositions appear to be immune from empirical disconfirmation; (2) mathematical propositions appear to be known with certainty; and (3) mathematical propositions are necessary. The primary purpose of this paper is to examine whether any of these alleged features of mathematical propositions establishes that knowledge of such propositions cannot be a posteriori

Keywords: mathematical; knowledge; a priori; empiricism; disconfirmation; certainty; necessity

Chapter.  9768 words. 

Subjects: Metaphysics

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.