<i>Review Essay</i>—Remarks on Post-Sovereignty and International Legal Neoconservatism<sup>†</sup>

Ignacio De La Rasilla and Del Moral

in Comparative Law as Transnational Law

Published in print December 2011 | ISBN: 9780199795208
Published online January 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780199919307 | DOI:
Review Essay—Remarks on Post-Sovereignty and International Legal Neoconservatism†

Show Summary Details


This chapter reviews the books, Law Without Nations? Why Constitutional Government Requires Sovereign States and The Case for Sovereignty: Why the World Should Welcome American Independence, by Jeremy Rabkin. It presents Rabkin's neoconservative defense of United States sovereignty by attempting to soften the impact of the most rhetorically aggressive aspects embedded in his books. Playing along with his rhetorical, strident spiral risks obscuring far more scholarly substantive considerations that frame his work within a specific contemporary doctrinal trend. To categorize Rabkin's as “untouchable” by stressing the aspects of its partisan political posture that would also gratuitously reinforce the accursed fame that neoconservative legal scholars enjoy within their own academy. Moreover, approaching Rabkin's scholarship without animosity offers additional analytic possibilities beyond simply adding another chapter to the inflated rhetoric of “hegemonic international law” that is so in vogue.

Keywords: United States; law; sovereignty; constitutional government; sovereign states; American independence; book review

Chapter.  5312 words. 

Subjects: Public International Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.