Representing the World Egocentrically

Berit Brogaard

in Transient Truths

Published in print April 2012 | ISBN: 9780199796908
Published online May 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780199933235 | DOI:
Representing the World Egocentrically

Show Summary Details


In Relativism and Monadic Truth Herman Cappelen and John Hawthorne set out to defend a monadic theory of truth that takes all propositions to have truth-values simpliciter. The core of their argument is that most of the evidence in favor of a relativistic semantics can be handled by a version of flexible contextualism that takes the candidate expressions to be associated with a hidden variable that can take on values other than the speaker. For example, ‘this chili is tasty’ has the underlying form ‘this chili is tasty to X’, where the value of ‘X’ can be the speaker, the hearer or a third party. I begin with a brief presentation of Cappelen and Hawthorne’s arguments against non-indexical contextualism, temporalism and relativism. I then offer a general argument against the monadic truth package and their rejection of non-indexical contextualism. Finally, I provide a self-standing argument for temporalism.

Keywords: monadic theory of truth; truth-values simpliciter; relativistic semantics; operator-free semantics; non-indexical contextualism; representationalism; phenomenal character; perceptual experience; belief; desire; memory

Chapter.  6941 words. 

Subjects: Philosophy of Language

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.