The Future of Opinion

Ronald N. Jacobs

in The Space of Opinion

Published in print October 2011 | ISBN: 9780199797929
Published online May 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780199944170 | DOI:
The Future of Opinion

Show Summary Details


Chapter 9 places empirical findings about mediated deliberation in the context of research about the declining quality of mediated public communication. It suggests that larger questions about critical rationality are best posed to the space of opinion as a whole, rather than to specific opinion formats. True, a plethora of new opinion formats offer new definitions of autonomy and influence than those traditionally offered by objective journalism. These formats tend to be partisan and reductive, as they seek a new kind of influence in politics rather than autonomy from it. But it is important to understand that newer formats have emerged in a densely interconnected space of opinion which is characterized by increasingly intertextual processes of monitoring and criticism that occur across and between formats. In this context, it behooves those media intellectuals who seek to defend traditional journalistic virtues to provide meta-commentary to identify their own enemies in the world of punditry, and to clearly justify their own vision of what news and opinion should be. In the end, the degree of critical rationality in the opinion space depends not on the arguments that are made within a single forum, but rather on the ensemble of spaces, and on the nature of critical dialogue that takes place between them.

Keywords: mediated deliberation; democratic deliberation; critical rationality; opinion format; format proliferation; audience fragmentation; partisanship; influence; autonomy; complexity

Chapter.  5908 words. 

Subjects: Sociology

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.