Chapter

The Sorry State of Modern Payment Systems Law

James Steven Rogers

in The End of Negotiable Instruments

Published in print December 2011 | ISBN: 9780199856220
Published online January 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780199919574 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199856220.003.0001
The Sorry State of Modern Payment Systems Law

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Company and Commercial Law

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

In the mid-twentieth century, payments law meant the law of checks and promissory notes, as set out in Article 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code. Long ago, a “negotiable instrument” was a privately issued instrument that circulated from hand to hand as a substitute for currency. Although that no longer happens, twentieth century law was still based on concepts of negotiability, including the “holder in due course” doctrine. The worst effects of that doctrine were eliminated by developments in Federal law in the late twentieth century. The law, however, has not considered whether there is anything useful left in the law of negotiable instruments once the holder in due course doctrine has been eliminated.

Keywords: negotiable instrument; check; promissory note; payment systems; negotiability; holder in due course; anachronism

Chapter.  6355 words. 

Subjects: Company and Commercial Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.