Testing the Argument

Patricia L. Sullivan

in Who Wins?

Published in print July 2012 | ISBN: 9780199878338
Published online September 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780199950294 | DOI:
Testing the Argument

Show Summary Details


This chapter explains how historical data is employed here to evaluate how well the theory previously developed—referred to as the war aims model—stacks up against alternative explanations of violent conflict outcomes. It begins by asking what we would expect to observe if the model accurately represents the primary determinants of war outcomes. It derives specific, falsifiable hypotheses from this theory and the competing theories described in Chapter 1. It then discusses the data brought to bear on the problem and how the concepts are operationalized and measured in the hypotheses.

Keywords: armed conflict outcomes; historical data; war aims model; operationalization; measurement

Chapter.  10781 words. 

Subjects: International Relations

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.