Chapter

“Short-Lived” versus “Long-Standing”

Reiko Ohnuma

in Ties That Bind

Published in print July 2012 | ISBN: 9780199915651
Published online September 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780199950058 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199915651.003.0006
“Short-Lived” versus “Long-Standing”

Show Summary Details

Preview

This chapter, together with the previous two, presents the argument that the Buddhist tradition has consciously shaped the two mothers of the Buddha, Māyā and Mahāprajāpatī, into a contrasting pair, using this pair to explore the nature of motherhood in a highly imaginative fashion. The argument, in brief, is that Māyā is highly idealized as a perfect embodiment of the Maternal Function, yet this idealization comes at the expense of her spiritual potential; by contrast, Mahāprajāpatī is treated ambivalently and sometimes negatively, yet this is the result of granting her her spiritual potential. More particularly, this chapter looks at several contexts in which the two mothers are depicted as mothers in grief and develops the argument that Māyā is a spiritually stunted creature, precisely because she is reduced to her motherhood, whereas Mahāprajāpatī stands for women’s full autonomy and subjectivity and serves as a vindication of women’s spiritual potential.

Keywords: Buddha’s mothers; Māyā; Mahāprajāpatī; women’s autonomy; spiritual potential; maternal grief

Chapter.  9128 words. 

Subjects: Buddhism

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.