Evidentiary Independence

Lisa E. Hasel

in Memory and Law

Published in print July 2012 | ISBN: 9780199920754
Published online January 2013 | e-ISBN: 9780199950133 | DOI:

Series: Oxford Series in Neuroscience, Law, and Philosophy

Evidentiary Independence

Show Summary Details


Evidence collected early in a criminal investigation has been shown to affect the decisions made by criminal investigators, forensic scientists, and witnesses to a crime. The early evidence can spark an array of confirmation biases that affect the collection and interpretation other evidence throughout the investigation. Therefore, one piece of faulty evidence collected early in an investigation can lead to the accumulation of multiple pieces of faulty evidence, which may result in a wrongful conviction. This chapter addresses how distinct pieces evidence collected during an investigation may not be independent of one another. Because of its implications for memory, this chapter largely focuses on how eyewitnesses’ memories can be influenced, leading to the contamination of important evidence that may be presented in a criminal trial. Suggestions are made for decreasing evidentiary interdependence during investigations.

Keywords: eyewitness; memory; post-Identification feedback; co-witness; evidence interactions; criminal investigators; forensic scientists; confirmation biases; tunnel vision

Chapter.  7449 words. 

Subjects: Neuropsychology

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.