Chapter

Monetizing Memory Science

Francis X. Shen

in Memory and Law

Published in print July 2012 | ISBN: 9780199920754
Published online January 2013 | e-ISBN: 9780199950133 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199920754.003.0013

Series: Oxford Series in Neuroscience, Law, and Philosophy

Monetizing Memory Science

Show Summary Details

Preview

This chapter explores the possible effects of new neuroscientific evidence on civil recovery and damage awards for emotional injuries in the American tort system. The chapter presents new experimental evidence suggesting that neuroscientific evidence of PTSD, so long as it is contested in court, is not likely to lead to greater monetary awards from juries. But the experimental results also suggest that cognitive neuroscience may challenge existing legal distinctions between “bodily” and “mental” injury. How novel neuroscientific evidence is translated into statutory law and policy may thus have significant ramifications for civil recovery. Neuroscience research, if utilized by both sides, may have a net neutral effect on PTSD litigation. But if one side, or even one litigator, moves quickly and moves first, there may be significant gains to be realized from monetizing memory science.

Keywords: neurolaw; law and neuroscience; pTSD; memory; civil damages; brain; jury

Chapter.  13336 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Neuropsychology

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.