Chapter

Conclusion

Lord Denning

in The Due Process of Law

Published in print January 1980 | ISBN: 9780406176080
Published online March 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780191705113 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780406176080.003.0008
Conclusion

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Constitutional and Administrative Law

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

The process of contempt of court is designed to secure that every person has a fair trial. It is a procedure by which the court condemns any conduct which tends to prejudice a fair trial. The present tendency is to say that the process should be left in the hands of the Attorney-General: that he is the person who should decide whether it should be invóked or not. It is no doubt proper for any complaint to be laid before the Attorney-General so that he may, if he thinks fit, institute proceedings for contempt. But it should not be exclusively in his hands. Some cases wear a political complexion. The Attorney-General may be reluctant to take proceedings for fear of repercussions affecting his party. So the courts should be able to take steps at the instance of anyone who has a sufficient interest in the matter.

Keywords: contempt; court; fair trial; Attorney-General; proceedings

Chapter.  329 words. 

Subjects: Constitutional and Administrative Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.