Chapter

Abolition of the Insanity Defense

Christopher Slobogin

in Criminal Law Conversations

Published in print November 2011 | ISBN: 9780199861279
Published online April 2015 | e-ISBN: 9780190260071 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199861279.003.0022
Abolition of the Insanity Defense

Show Summary Details

Preview

This chapter presents an authoritative case for the abolition of the insanity defense. It argues that, both morally and practically, the most appropriate manner of recognizing the mitigating impact of mental illness in criminal cases is to recast it as a factor relevant to the general defenses, rather than treat it as a predicate for a special defense. It first considers the retributive principle that blameworthiness should be the predominate guidepost of the criminal law's attempt to define the scope of liability. It then examines the limitations of existing and proposed tests for insanity, including the volitional test, the appreciation test, and the rationality test. It also discusses the role that mental illness should play when negligence is the mens rea and when, if ever, ignorance of the criminal law due to mental disorder should be an excuse. The chapter includes comments by some of the nation's top legal scholars from the field of criminal law, tackling topics such as cognition, integrationism, and justification of defenses.

Keywords: insanity defense; mental illness; blameworthiness; criminal law; insanity; negligence; mens rea; cognition; integrationism

Chapter.  8619 words. 

Subjects: Criminal Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.