Journal Article

Randomized Trial of Financial Incentives and Delivery Methods for Improving Response to a Mailed Questionnaire

Michele Morin Doody, Alice S. Sigurdson, Diane Kampa, Kathleen Chimes, Bruce H. Alexander, Elaine Ron, Robert E. Tarone and Martha S. Linet

in American Journal of Epidemiology

Published on behalf of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Volume 157, issue 7, pages 643-651
Published in print April 2003 | ISSN: 0002-9262
Published online April 2003 | e-ISSN: 1476-6256 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwg033
Randomized Trial of Financial Incentives and Delivery Methods for Improving Response to a Mailed Questionnaire

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Public Health and Epidemiology

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

In a follow-up study, only 64% of 126,628 US radiologic technologists completed a questionnaire during 1994–1997 after two mailings. The authors conducted a randomized trial of financial incentives and delivery methods to identify the least costly approach for increasing overall participation. They randomly selected nine samples of 300 nonresponders each to receive combinations of no, $1.00, $2.00, and $5.00 cash or check incentives delivered by first-class mail or Federal Express. Federal Express delivery did not achieve greater participation than first-class mail (23.2% vs. 23.7%). In analyses pooled across delivery methods, the response was significantly greater for the $2.00 bill (28.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 25.2, 32.7; p < 0.0001), $5.00 check (27.5%, 95% CI: 22.5, 33.0; p = 0.0001), $1.00 bill (24.6%, 95% CI: 21.2, 28.3; p = 0.0007), and $2.00 check (21.8%, 95% CI: 18.5, 25.3; p = 0.02) compared with no incentive (16.6%, 95% CI: 13.7, 19.9). The response increased significantly with increasing incentive amounts from $0.00 to $2.00 cash (p trend < 0.0001). The $2.00 bill achieved a 30% greater response than did a $2.00 check (p = 0.005). For incentives sent by first-class mail, the $5.00 check yielded 30% greater participation than did the $2.00 check (p = 0.07). A $1.00 bill, chosen instead of the $2.00 bill because of substantially lower overall cost and sent by first-class mail to the remaining 42,717 nonresponders, increased response from 64% to 72%.

Keywords: cohort studies; data collection; epidemiologic methods; motivation; nonresponse; postal service; questionnaires; randomized controlled trials; Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

Journal Article.  5652 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Public Health and Epidemiology

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.