Journal Article

Intervention-related Bias in Reporting of Food Intake by Fifth-Grade Children Participating in an Obesity Prevention Study

Lisa Harnack, John H. Himes, Jean Anliker, Theresa Clay, Joel Gittelsohn, Jared B. Jobe, Kimberly Ring, Pat Snyder, Janice Thompson and Judy L. Weber

in American Journal of Epidemiology

Published on behalf of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Volume 160, issue 11, pages 1117-1121
Published in print December 2004 | ISSN: 0002-9262
Published online December 2004 | e-ISSN: 1476-6256 | DOI:
Intervention-related Bias in Reporting of Food Intake by Fifth-Grade Children Participating in an Obesity Prevention Study

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Public Health and Epidemiology


Show Summary Details


Data collected as part of Pathways, a school-based trial for the primary prevention of obesity in American Indian children conducted between 1997 and 2000, were analyzed to examine possible intervention-related bias in food reporting. The authors hypothesized that children in the intervention schools may have systematically underreported their dietary intake relative to children in the control schools. Nutrient intake estimates for lunch derived from record-assisted 24-hour dietary recalls were compared with intake estimates from observed lunch intakes. Reported nutrient intakes were included in regression analyses as the dependent variables; observed intake, intervention condition, and age were included as independent variables. Results indicated that, among females, intervention condition was a significant predictor of reported energy, fat, and saturated fatty acid intakes. Independently of observed intake, reported lunch energy intake among females in the intervention schools was 66.8 calories lower than reported intake among females in the control schools (p = 0.03). These findings suggest that investigators should consider bias in reporting of dietary intake by intervention condition when conducting diet-focused intervention studies. Specifically, enhancing measures that rely on self-reports with objective measures of dietary intake would help investigators to evaluate whether differential reporting by treatment group has occurred.

Keywords: bias (epidemiology); intervention studies; nutrition assessment

Journal Article.  3031 words. 

Subjects: Public Health and Epidemiology

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.