Journal Article

Optimized atomic statistical potentials: assessment of protein interfaces and loops

Guang Qiang Dong, Hao Fan, Dina Schneidman-Duhovny, Ben Webb and Andrej Sali

in Bioinformatics

Volume 29, issue 24, pages 3158-3166
Published in print December 2013 | ISSN: 1367-4803
Published online September 2013 | e-ISSN: 1460-2059 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt560
Optimized atomic statistical potentials: assessment of protein interfaces and loops

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Bioinformatics and Computational Biology

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

Motivation: Statistical potentials have been widely used for modeling whole proteins and their parts (e.g. sidechains and loops) as well as interactions between proteins, nucleic acids and small molecules. Here, we formulate the statistical potentials entirely within a statistical framework, avoiding questionable statistical mechanical assumptions and approximations, including a definition of the reference state.

Results: We derive a general Bayesian framework for inferring statistically optimized atomic potentials (SOAP) in which the reference state is replaced with data-driven ‘recovery’ functions. Moreover, we restrain the relative orientation between two covalent bonds instead of a simple distance between two atoms, in an effort to capture orientation-dependent interactions such as hydrogen bonds. To demonstrate this general approach, we computed statistical potentials for protein–protein docking (SOAP-PP) and loop modeling (SOAP-Loop). For docking, a near-native model is within the top 10 scoring models in 40% of the PatchDock benchmark cases, compared with 23 and 27% for the state-of-the-art ZDOCK and FireDock scoring functions, respectively. Similarly, for modeling 12-residue loops in the PLOP benchmark, the average main-chain root mean square deviation of the best scored conformations by SOAP-Loop is 1.5 Å, close to the average root mean square deviation of the best sampled conformations (1.2 Å) and significantly better than that selected by Rosetta (2.1 Å), DFIRE (2.3 Å), DOPE (2.5 Å) and PLOP scoring functions (3.0 Å). Our Bayesian framework may also result in more accurate statistical potentials for additional modeling applications, thus affording better leverage of the experimentally determined protein structures.

Availability and implementation: SOAP-PP and SOAP-Loop are available as part of MODELLER (http://salilab.org/modeller).

Contact: sali@salilab.org

Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Journal Article.  6540 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Bioinformatics and Computational Biology

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.