Journal Article

Presentism and Relativity

Yuri Balashov and Michel Janssen

in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

Published on behalf of British Society for the Philosophy of Science

Volume 54, issue 2, pages 327-346
Published in print June 2003 | ISSN: 0007-0882
Published online June 2003 | e-ISSN: 1464-3537 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjps/54.2.327
Presentism and Relativity

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Science and Mathematics

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

In this critical notice we argue against William Craig's recent attempt to reconcile presentism (roughly, the view that only the present is real) with relativity theory. Craig's defense of his position boils down to endorsing a ‘neo‐Lorentzian interpretation’ of special relativity. We contend that his reconstruction of Lorentz's theory and its historical development is fatally flawed and that his arguments for reviving this theory fail on many counts.

1 Rival theories of time

2 Relativity and the present

3 Special relativity: one theory, three interpretations

4 Theories of principle and constructive theories

5 The relativity interpretation: explanatorily deficient?

6 The relativity interpretation: ontologically fragmented?

7 The space‐time interpretation: does God need a preferred frame of reference?

8 The neo‐Lorentzian interpretation: at what price?

9 The neo‐Lorentzian interpretation: with what payoff?

10 Why we should prefer the space‐time interpretation over the neo‐Lorentzian interpretation

11 What about general relativity?

12 Squaring the tenseless space‐time interpretation with our tensed experience

Journal Article.  0 words. 

Subjects: Philosophy of Science ; Science and Mathematics

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.