Journal Article

Is There an Independent Principle of Causality in Physics?

John D. Norton

in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

Published on behalf of British Society for the Philosophy of Science

Volume 60, issue 3, pages 475-486
Published in print September 2009 | ISSN: 0007-0882
Published online September 2009 | e-ISSN: 1464-3537 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axp030
Is There an Independent Principle of Causality in Physics?

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Science and Mathematics

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

Mathias Frisch has argued that the requirement that electromagnetic dispersion processes are causal adds empirical content not found in electrodynamic theory. I urge that this attempt to reconstitute a local principle of causality in physics fails. An independent principle is not needed to recover the results of dispersion theory. The use of ‘causality conditions’ proves to be the mere adding of causal labels to an already presumed fact. If instead one seeks a broader, independently formulated grounding for the conditions, that grounding either fails or dissolves into vagueness and ambiguity, as has traditionally been the fate of candidate principles of causality.

Introduction

Scattering in Classical Electrodynamics

Sufficiency of the Physics

Failure of the Principle of Causality Proposed 4.1

A sometimes principle

4.2

The conditions of applicability are obscure

4.3

Effects can come before their causes

4.4

Vagueness of the relata and of the notion of causal process

Conclusion

Journal Article.  5126 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Philosophy of Science ; Science and Mathematics

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.