Journal Article

Epilepsy surgery does not harm motor performance of children and adolescents

R. van Empelen, A. Jennekens-Schinkel, J. W. Gorter, M. J. M. Volman, O. van Nieuwenhuizen and P. J. M. Helders

in Brain

Published on behalf of The Guarantors of Brain

Volume 128, issue 7, pages 1536-1545
Published in print July 2005 | ISSN: 0006-8950
Published online April 2005 | e-ISSN: 1460-2156 | DOI:
Epilepsy surgery does not harm motor performance of children and adolescents

Show Summary Details


The impact of epilepsy surgery on motor performance, activities of daily life (ADL) and caregiver assistance was assessed in 37 children (age range 0.1–15.4 years) with pharmacologically untreatable epilepsy, 17 of whom were also diagnosed as having spasticity of cerebral origin. All patients underwent epilepsy surgery between 1996 and 2001 at the Wilhelmina University Children's Hospital and were assessed using a standard protocol at fixed intervals: before surgery and 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after surgery. The type of surgery was hemispherectomy (n = 14) and temporal (n = 14), frontal (n = 4), parietal (n = 2) and central (n = 2) resection. One child underwent callosotomy. Engel's classification was used to determine seizure outcome. Impairments were measured in terms of muscle strength, range of motion and muscle tone. Motor performance of infants and children without spasticity was measured using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (M-ABC). The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88) was used in children with spasticity, the severity of motor disability in this group being determined by means of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS). Daily activities and caregiver's assistance were measured in all children using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Twenty-four months after surgery 74% of the children could be classified as Engel class 1, indicating a significant seizure reduction. Impairments revealed some decrease in muscle strength and range of motion in the group with spasticity. Scores improved statistically significantly at group level on M-ABC and GMFM (P < 0.05). Improvement in activities of daily life and caregiver's assistance could not be measured in children without spasticity because of the ceiling effect of the PEDI, but children with spasticity improved significantly with respect to these parameters (PEDI) (P < 0.05). Hence, epilepsy surgery does not harm motor performance in children with or without spasticity.

Keywords: epilepsy surgery; children; motor development; GMFCS; activities of daily life (ADL); ADL = activities of daily life; GMFCS = Gross Motor Function Classification System; GMFM = Gross Motor Function Measure; ICF = International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; M-ABC = Movement Assessment Battery for Children; PEDI = Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory

Journal Article.  6624 words. 

Subjects: Neurology ; Neuroscience

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.