Journal Article

Repression of c-myc gene expression by the thiol and disulfide forms of the cytoprotector amifostine.

S C Liu, J S Murley, G Woloschak and D J Grdina

in Carcinogenesis

Volume 18, issue 12, pages 2457-2459
Published in print December 1997 | ISSN: 0143-3334
Published online December 1997 | e-ISSN: 1460-2180 | DOI:
Repression of c-myc gene expression by the thiol and disulfide forms of the cytoprotector amifostine.

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Clinical Cytogenetics and Molecular Genetics


Show Summary Details


The clinically approved cytoprotector amifostine, designated WR-2721, [S-2-(3-aminopropylamino)ethylphosphorothioic acid], protects against both radiation and drug-induced mutagenesis in animal systems. These effects extend over a wide concentration range making amifostine a strong candidate for evaluation as a possible cancer chemopreventive agent. To better identify and develop potential intermediate biomarkers for chemoprevention at the molecular level we applied the technique of differential display RT-PCR to assess the effects of both the thiol (SH), i.e. WR1065 and the disulfide (SS), i.e. WR-33278, metabolites of amifostine on gene expression in CHO-AA8 cells. Cells were exposed to either 40 microM or 4 mM of each agent for 30 min, and subsequent changes in gene expression were identified and contrasted to that found in corresponding untreated control cells. One band that showed a differential response was sequenced and was found to have 78% homology with a segment of the human pHL-1 cDNA clone contained in GenBank. This clone contains a COX III mitochondrial DNA insert and two exons of human c-myc. Northern blot analyses were performed by using the cloned human c-myc exon 1 probe to confirm whether c-myc gene expression was affected. Repression of c-myc expression was observed under all of the conditions evaluated. An exposure of cells to 40 microM of the disulfide form of amifostine was the most effective in repressing c-myc, i.e. 27% of control level. A concentration of 4 mM of the disulfide form reduced gene expression to 45% of the control level, while the thiol form was less effective, with 4 mM and 40 microM concentrations reducing c-myc gene expression to 65% and 46% of control levels, respectively.

Journal Article.  0 words. 

Subjects: Clinical Cytogenetics and Molecular Genetics

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.