Journal Article

Measures of genotype versus gene products: promise and pitfalls in cancer prevention

Habibul Ahsan and Andrew G. Rundle

in Carcinogenesis

Volume 24, issue 9, pages 1429-1434
Published in print September 2003 | ISSN: 0143-3334
Published online September 2003 | e-ISSN: 1460-2180 | DOI:
Measures of genotype versus gene products: promise and pitfalls in cancer prevention

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Clinical Cytogenetics and Molecular Genetics


Show Summary Details


We present a critical assessment of the promise and pitfalls of genotype versus gene function measures in cancer epidemiology studies. While both measures have pros and cons and are complementary, in terms of potential for contributing knowledge that directly leads to prevention, we argue that attention should be given to research relating functional parameters (single protein expression, functional or phenotypic assays or patterns of gene/protein expression) to disease risk. We present the theoretical and conceptual basis of why studies focusing on polymorphisms in the low-penetrance genes may be logically less fruitful for making inroads to cancer prevention than appropriately designed studies using validated functional parameters. We then substantiate these arguments with some concrete examples based on the current literature. We also discuss the limitations of including functional parameters in epidemiological studies and technical improvements required before such studies can truly fulfil their promise. Finally, we offer some specific recommendations for future research directions in this area.

Keywords: GST, glutathione S-transferase; PAH, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms

Journal Article.  5365 words. 

Subjects: Clinical Cytogenetics and Molecular Genetics

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.