Journal Article

Comparison of Analytical Techniques for Detection of Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol in Aqueous Samples

Barry Hurlburt, Steven W. Lloyd and Casey C. Grimm

in Journal of Chromatographic Science

Volume 47, issue 8, pages 670-673
Published in print September 2009 | ISSN: 0021-9665
Published online September 2009 | e-ISSN: 1945-239X | DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/47.8.670
Comparison of Analytical Techniques for Detection of Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol in Aqueous Samples

Show Summary Details

Preview

Geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol are secondary metabolites expressed by a variety of organisms that are responsible for off-flavors in public water supplies, aquaculture, and a host of other important products. Hence, there is continuing research into the causes for their expression and methods to mitigate it, which require sensitive and accurate detection methods. In recent years, several new techniques for collecting and concentrating volatile and semi-volatile compounds have been automated and commercialized, making them available for use in most laboratories. In this study, we compared solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and membrane-assisted solvent extraction (MASE) for the detection of 2-methylisoborneol and geosmin in aqueous samples. SPME is the most sensitive of these techniques with a limit of detection of 25 parts-per-trillion for 2-methylisoborneol and 10 parts-per-trillion for geosmin but with a large relative standard deviation. MASE is less sensitive, but provides a greater level of precision, as well as the ability for multiple injections from the same sample.

Journal Article.  0 words. 

Subjects: Chemistry

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.