Journal Article

An evaluation of clinicians' choices when selecting archwires

Clare McNamara, Karen J. Drage, Jonathan R. Sandy and Anthony J. Ireland

in The European Journal of Orthodontics

Published on behalf of European Orthodontics Society

Volume 32, issue 1, pages 54-59
Published in print February 2010 | ISSN: 0141-5387
Published online August 2009 | e-ISSN: 1460-2210 | DOI:
An evaluation of clinicians' choices when selecting archwires

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Restorative Dentistry and Orthodontics


Show Summary Details


The aim of this research was to determine the choices made by clinicians with respect to archwires and arch form during the initial and latter stages of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.

A questionnaire-based study was carried out at Bristol Dental Hospital between November 2005 and March 2006. Questionnaires were distributed within the dental hospital and at local meetings in order to obtain a mixed sample of hospital and practice-based orthodontists. The clinicians asked to complete the questionnaire were consultant orthodontists (n = 37), specialist practitioners (n = 36), senior specialist registrars in orthodontics (n = 10), and dentists with a special interest in orthodontics (n = 17). The questionnaire consisted of two parts: the first was concerned with the initial alignment phase of treatment and the second with the space-closing phase of treatment in premolar extraction cases. The choice of archwires, significance of arch form, and intra-arch dimensions considered important at both stages were assessed. The clinicians were also asked about their usual practice with regard to adaptation of working archwires and the use of study models and symmetry charts.

One hundred questionnaires were returned, giving a response rate of 92.6 per cent. The majority of clinicians felt that preservation of the pre-treatment arch form was essential in the latter but not in the early stages of treatment. In particular, conservation of the original intercanine width was considered important. However, there was no uniformity in how arch form should be preserved. Some respondents used study models and symmetry charts as an aid, but even then they were used in different ways. There was no uniformity in the landmarks used when adapting stainless steel archwires to arch form. Therefore, even when clinicians do adapt their archwires carefully with the intention of preserving arch form, are they choosing the correct arch form?

Journal Article.  3799 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Restorative Dentistry and Orthodontics

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.