Journal Article

A clinical photogrammetric method to measure dental arch dimensions and mesio-distal tooth size

David Normando, Polyanna Lima da Silva and Álvaro Moraes Mendes

in The European Journal of Orthodontics

Published on behalf of European Orthodontics Society

Volume 33, issue 6, pages 721-726
Published in print December 2011 | ISSN: 0141-5387
Published online January 2011 | e-ISSN: 1460-2210 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq149
A clinical photogrammetric method to measure dental arch dimensions and mesio-distal tooth size

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Restorative Dentistry and Orthodontics

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

The aim of this research was to evaluate the reliability and validity of measurements obtained from clinical standardized occlusal photographs compared with dental cast measurements. This study comprised a consecutive sample of 16 patients (eight males and eight females, aged 15–24 years) in the permanent dentition without agenesis and/or tooth loss. A paired t-test and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to examine validity and reliability. Both statistics were applied for intra- and inter-methods error analysis, at P < 0.05.

Random error for the photogrammetric method (less than 0.48 mm) was similar to that for the dental cast measurements (less than 0.43 mm). ICC revealed excellent reliability for both methods (P < 0.01) and no significant difference for any variables, with the exception of upper inter-canine width obtained on the dental casts (P = 0.0038) and photogrammetry (P = 0.01). However, differences were less than 1 per cent of the mean inter-canine width. Inter-method analysis showed a significant correlation for all variables (P < 0.001), with good to excellent reliability (r = 0.66–0.93). A significant mean inter-method difference was consistently observed for the upper first molars (0.33 mm, P < 0.01). For the remaining teeth (left to right second premolars), the largest mean difference was approximately equal to the resolution of the human eye (0.2 mm or less). Minor differences (around 2 per cent of the mean) and an excellent ICC (0.75–0.93, P < 0.01) were observed for arch dimensions.

Except for the mesio-distal width of the upper first molars, the recently developed photogrammetric method showed accuracy, validity, and reliability acceptable for clinical and scientific purposes.

Journal Article.  2412 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Restorative Dentistry and Orthodontics

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.