Journal Article

Responsive evaluation in health promotion: its value for ambiguous contexts

Tineke A. Abma

in Health Promotion International

Volume 20, issue 4, pages 391-397
Published in print December 2005 | ISSN: 0957-4824
Published online June 2005 | e-ISSN: 1460-2245 | DOI:
Responsive evaluation in health promotion: its value for ambiguous contexts

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Public Health and Epidemiology


Show Summary Details


Responsive evaluation offers a perspective in which evaluation is reframed from the assessment of program interventions on the basis of policymakers' goals to an engagement with all stakeholders about the value and meaning of their practice. This article argues for this perspective both generally and more particularly in relation to health promotion. Responsive evaluation is especially appropriate in health promotion contexts characterized by a high degree of ambiguity. Ambiguity refers to the absence of or contradictory interpretations about what needs to, can and should be done, when and where. Ambiguity is high in the case of non-routine programs, lack of knowledge about success indicators, collaborative and communitybased programs and the absence of consensus among stakeholders. In health promotion contexts marked by a low degree of ambiguity random controlled trials (RCTs) and quantitative methods are to be considered. This implies the evaluators should assess the degree of ambiguity of a situation before deciding about an appropriate design.

Keywords: ambiguity; health promotion; responsive evaluation

Journal Article.  3892 words. 

Subjects: Public Health and Epidemiology

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.