Journal Article

Courts and the marginalized: Comparative perspectives

Siri Gloppen and Rachel Sieder

in International Journal of Constitutional Law

Published on behalf of The New York University School of Law

Volume 5, issue 2, pages 183-186
Published in print April 2007 | ISSN: 1474-2640
Published online April 2007 | e-ISSN: 1474-2659 | DOI:
Courts and the marginalized: Comparative perspectives

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Constitutional and Administrative Law
  • UK Politics


Show Summary Details


Those landmark cases where courts have assertively defended the rights of poor, vulnerable, or insular groups—such as homosexuals, refugees, or indigenous peoples—even in the face of social hostility and indifference have generated considerable interest in the role of courts as protectors of the marginalized. What role can and do courts play in protecting the interests and rights of vulnerable groups? Why do some marginalized groups succeed in having their rights recognized by the courts, while others fail? What makes some judiciaries more activist and receptive to their concerns and others less so? The four articles presented in this symposium originated in an interdisciplinary workshop held in Santiago, Chile, in December 2005, which attempted to answer these questions. The focus of the workshop was on new democracies in Africa and Latin America, but participants also drew on the experiences of more developed and stable legal systems in Europe.1

Journal Article.  1633 words. 

Subjects: Constitutional and Administrative Law ; UK Politics

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.