Journal Article

Comparison and the Ubiquity of Resemblance

David Decosimo

in Journal of the American Academy of Religion

Published on behalf of American Academy of Religion

Volume 78, issue 1, pages 226-258
Published in print March 2010 | ISSN: 0002-7189
Published online February 2010 | e-ISSN: 1477-4585 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfp089
Comparison and the Ubiquity of Resemblance

Show Summary Details

Preview

Since at least the nineteenth century and arguably centuries earlier, comparison has figured prominently in the study of religion. It continues to do so today, especially in the subfield of comparative religious ethics (“CRE”). This article considers the implications for comparative work more broadly and CRE in particular if we take seriously Nelson Goodman's insight that “similarity is relative, variable and context-dependent … [and that] every two things have some property in common.” Specifically, the article first contends that embracing Goodman's insight helps identify a variety of problems that are relatively common in comparative work and are rooted in the challenges posed by the ubiquity and relativity of resemblance. Secondly, the article shows how Goodman can help make our work better by underlining the necessity of a clear purpose for our comparisons, and it illustrates the point by considering an exemplary recent work of CRE. Thirdly, it shows that Goodman's point demands that we welcome a wide diversity of approaches and goals in comparative work. The article concludes with a suggestion about what might hold the subfield of CRE together.

Journal Article.  14576 words. 

Subjects: Religious Studies

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.