Journal Article

Prosecutorial Discretion before National Courts and International Tribunals<sup>1</sup>

Daniel D. Ntanda Nsereko

in Journal of International Criminal Justice

Volume 3, issue 1, pages 124-144
Published in print March 2005 | ISSN: 1478-1387
Published online March 2005 | e-ISSN: 1478-1395 | DOI:
Prosecutorial Discretion before National Courts and International Tribunals1

Show Summary Details


The decision to enforce the law against suspected offenders involves the exercise of independent professional judgment. This means that it cannot be made by hard and fast rules. It calls for an appreciation of a number of factors that must inform the decision. To do that, the prosecutor must have freedom to decide as he sees fit and according to his appreciation of those factors. This is discretion. However, the degree of discretion that the prosecutor possesses varies from country to country and from legal system to legal system. In some countries, prosecutors possess absolute discretion. They are not subject to the direction or control of any person or authority — not even the courts. In other countries, they are subject to the direction of the Minister of Justice or of Home Affairs or of the courts. The prosecutors of international tribunals possess much less discretion than their national counterparts. This is so because of the restricted nature of their mandate and the politically heterogeneous community that they serve. Nevertheless, whatever the degree of discretion that prosecutors possess, they must exercise it reasonably and in the public interest. They must also be accountable as to how they exercise it. For that reason, mechanisms must be in place to ensure that accountability.

Journal Article.  0 words. 

Subjects: Criminal Law ; International Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.