Journal Article

Broad claim scope invalidates formulation patent despite ‘powerful arguments’ to the contrary

Duncan Bucknell

in Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice

Volume 1, issue 8, pages 502-503
Published in print July 2006 | ISSN: 1747-1532
Published online May 2006 | e-ISSN: 1747-1540 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpl078
Broad claim scope invalidates formulation patent despite ‘powerful arguments’ to the contrary

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Arbitration
  • Intellectual Property Law

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

A lack of narrow dependent claims, which focus on the technical advance of the invention, meant that the main claim was held invalid as being obvious.

Journal Article.  798 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Arbitration ; Intellectual Property Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.