Journal Article

Supervised, Supported and Indirect Contact Orders: Research Findings

Alison Perry and Bernadette Rainey

in International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family

Volume 21, issue 1, pages 21-47
Published in print April 2007 | ISSN: 1360-9939
Published online March 2007 | e-ISSN: 1464-3707 | DOI:
Supervised, Supported and Indirect Contact Orders: Research Findings

Show Summary Details


Child contact with non-resident parents has become a key issue in family law and policy. Within the substantial and growing body of research into how legal systems deal with child contact disputes, there is little empirical data on the use courts make of orders for supervised, supported or indirect contact. This article presents empirical research findings focusing on the use of these sorts of contact orders in England and Wales. The research involved an examination of 343 court records, 60 follow-up interviews with parents and ten interviews with judges responsible for making the orders. Use of orders for supervised or supported contact was relatively common as a short-term measure, while orders for indirect contact were made only as a matter of last resort. On the basis of the post-court developments in contact within the families in the sample and the parents' largely negative experiences of the court system, we conclude that future policy developments ought to focus on finding alternatives to court, which would aim to provide assistance rather than adjudication to the families in dispute.

Journal Article.  12783 words. 

Subjects: Family Law ; Marriage and the Family

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.