Journal Article

Comity, Family Finances, Autonomy, and Transnational Legal Regimes

David S. Rosettenstein

in International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family

Volume 23, issue 2, pages 192-210
Published in print August 2009 | ISSN: 1360-9939
Published online April 2009 | e-ISSN: 1464-3707 | DOI:
Comity, Family Finances, Autonomy, and Transnational Legal Regimes

Show Summary Details


The doctrine of comity in Anglo-American private international law jurisprudence requires a court to justify a refusal to recognize family financial arrangements arising from activities in a foreign country. The justification usually advanced is public policy. This article examines the contours of the interface between the demands of comity and the justifications of public policy, against the backdrop of a case in which an American state court declined to recognize a strict title property regime flowing from a marriage contract entered into by a Muslim couple in the course of an arranged marriage in Pakistan. In particular, the article focuses on three key concerns of public policy – the ‘fairness’ of the foreign process; the actor's ‘choice’; and the ‘content’ of the foreign arrangement. With the parties’ autonomy increasingly respected in domestic financial arrangements – particularly in the context of prenuptial agreements – the article argues that such respect ought to be extended to foreign arrangements as well, except to the extent that the foreign regime adversely impacts the state's own interests, as distinct from the domestic jurisdiction's perception of the parties' interests.

Journal Article.  9143 words. 

Subjects: Family Law ; Marriage and the Family

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.