Journal Article

Dissociation between urine osmolality and urinary excretion of aquaporin‐2 in healthy volunteers

Ruben Baumgarten, Marjolein H. J. van de Pol, Peter M. T. Deen, Carel H. van Os and Jack F. M. Wetzels

in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Published on behalf of European Renal Association - European Dialysis and Transplant Assoc

Volume 15, issue 8, pages 1155-1161
Published in print August 2000 | ISSN: 0931-0509
Published online August 2000 | e-ISSN: 1460-2385 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/15.8.1155
Dissociation between urine osmolality and urinary excretion of aquaporin‐2 in healthy volunteers

Show Summary Details

Preview

Background. It has been suggested that urinary excretion of the vasopressin‐dependent water channel of the kidney collecting duct, aquaporin‐2 (AQP2), reflects renal vasopressin action and might be used clinically. It is unclear, however, what relation exists between urine osmolality and urinary excretion of AQP2 (UAQP2) and it is unknown whether UAQP2 is influenced by hyperosmolality of urine or tubular flow rates.

Methods. We measured urine osmolality and UAQP2 in healthy volunteers in various conditions: (i) overnight dehydration continued during the day, (ii) after infusion of 700 ml hypertonic saline (NaCl 2.5%), and (iii) after intranasal administration of 40 μg 1‐desamino‐8‐d‐arginine vasopressin (DDAVP). The last two tests were performed after water loading. In addition, a DDAVP test was performed, after administration of frusemide.

Results. After overnight dehydration, the urine osmolality increased from 888±18 to 1004±17 mosmol/kg during additional hours of thirsting, whereas UAQP2 doubled from 140±45 to 285±63 fmol AQP2/μmol creatinine. Infusion of hypertonic saline increased urine osmolality from 70±3 to 451±68 mosmol/kg, while UAQP2 remained almost zero. Urine osmolality increased from 101±17 to 860±30 mosmol/kg after administration of DDAVP, with a parallel increase in UAQP2 from 32±14 to 394±81 fmol AQP2/μmol creatinine. Pre‐treatment with frusemide attenuated the increase in urine osmolality, but had no effect on UAQP2 after DDAVP.

Conclusions. Our data demonstrate that a simple relationship between urine osmolality and UAQP2 does not exist. Therefore, random or once‐only measurements of UAQP2 as an index of renal vasopressin action are not useful. In contrast, intranasal application of DDAVP resulted in a parallel rise in urine osmolality and UAQP2. Therefore this test might be useful in studying patients with urine concentration defects. The DDAVP–frusemide test revealed that the release of AQP2 into urine is not caused by hypertonicity of tubular fluid.

Keywords: aquaporin‐2; osmolality; urinary excretion; vasopressin; volunteers

Journal Article.  4444 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Nephrology

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.