Journal Article

<i>In vitro</i> evaluation of motilin agonism by macrolide immunosuppressive drugs

Bruno Van Vlem, Renaat Schoonjans, Raymond Vanholder, Martine De Vos, Inge Depoortere, Theo L. Peeters and Romain Lefebvre

in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Published on behalf of European Renal Association - European Dialysis and Transplant Assoc

Volume 17, issue 6, pages 973-977
Published in print June 2002 | ISSN: 0931-0509
Published online June 2002 | e-ISSN: 1460-2385 | DOI:
In vitro evaluation of motilin agonism by macrolide immunosuppressive drugs

Show Summary Details


Background. The immunosuppressive drugs tacrolimus and sirolimus may have a stimulatory influence on gastric emptying, in view of their macrolide structure. The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro the possible interaction of tacrolimus and sirolimus with motilin receptors in the rabbit antrum and duodenum.

Methods. Rabbit duodenum strips were mounted under a load of 1 g in 10 ml organ baths containing Krebs solution. Erythromycin, tacrolimus, cyclosporin, and sirolimus were added to the bathing solution in a cumulative way; in a second series, after incubation with cyclosporin (10−7 mol/l), tacrolimus (10−8 mol/l), or sirolimus (3×10−8 mol/l), a cumulative concentration–response curve to erythromycin was obtained.

 The effect of cumulatively added tacrolimus and nle13‐porcine motilin on the contractile response to electrical field stimulation was tested in strips from the rabbit gastric antrum. Displacement by tacrolimus of 125I‐nle13‐porcine motilin bound to its receptor was tested with crude homogenates of the smooth‐muscle layer of the rabbit antrum.

Results. In rabbit duodenum strips, carbachol (10−5 mol/l) induced a stable and reproducible contraction. Erythromycin induced concentration‐dependent contractions. Expressed as a percentage of the response to carbachol, the maximal attained effect was 78%; the EC50 was 4.8×10−7 mol/l. Tacrolimus (10−8 to 10−5 mol/l), cyclosporin (10−8 to 10−5 mol/l), and sirolimus (10−8 to 3×10−5 mol/l) had no influence. The response to erythromycin (10−8 to 3×10−5 mol/l) in the presence of cyclosporin (10−7 mol/l), tacrolimus (10−8 mol/l), or sirolimus (3×10−8 mol/l) did not differ from that obtained with erythromycin alone, except for a decrease of the EC50 in the presence of tacrolimus (2.2×10−7 mol/l) (P<0.05 vs erythromycin alone). Motilin enhanced the response to electrical field stimulation of rabbit antral strips, but tacrolimus had no stimulatory effect. Tacrolimus weakly displaced motilin bound to its receptor. The pIC50 was 4.97.

Conclusions. As opposed to erythromycin, neither tacrolimus nor sirolimus showed a contractile effect in the rabbit duodenum. Tacrolimus did not activate the neural motilin receptor of the rabbit gastric antrum and had low affinity for the smooth‐muscle motilin receptor. It is thus unlikely that these macrolide immunosuppressive drugs possess gastroprokinetic effects via motilin agonism.

Keywords: cyclosporin; immunosuppressants; macrolide; motilin agonism; sirolimus; tacrolimus

Journal Article.  2843 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Nephrology

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.