Journal Article

Public survey of financial incentives for kidney donation

Leonieke Kranenburg, Andre Schram, Willij Zuidema, Wilem Weimar, Medard Hilhorst, Ellen Hessing, Jan Passchier and Jan Busschbach

in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Published on behalf of European Renal Association - European Dialysis and Transplant Assoc

Volume 23, issue 3, pages 1039-1042
Published in print March 2008 | ISSN: 0931-0509
Published online November 2007 | e-ISSN: 1460-2385 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfm643
Public survey of financial incentives for kidney donation

Show Summary Details

Preview

Background. One of the most fiercely debated strategies to increase the number of kidneys for transplantation is the introduction of financial incentives. As the success of such strategy largely depends on public support, we performed a public survey on this topic.

Methods. We developed a questionnaire on financial incentives for living kidney donation. We investigated the public opinion on two different fixed compensations: either life-long health insurance compensation or €25 000. Furthermore, we investigated public preferences on the practical implementation: either the patient seeks a donor or the donor registers for donation at an independent institute. For all examples, health insurance companies would cover costs of treatment. TNS NIPO, a professional organization for market research, sent the survey to a response panel that is made representative for the general population.

Results. Five hundred fifty respondents (M/F: 60/40; median age: 46) filled out the questionnaire. Forty-six percent considered the situation wherein health insurance companies would introduce financial incentives to increase the number of living kidney donors undesirable (26% undesirable; 20% very undesirable), compared to 25% who perceived this as desirable (20% desirable; 5% very desirable). The option wherein the donor registers at an independent institute to donate to a patient on the list and in turn receives life-long health insurance compensation was chosen as most favourable. Of all respondents, 5.5% stated that there was a (very) great chance that they would donate a kidney in order to get compensation if such system were to be reality.

Conclusion. Although almost half of the respondents (46%) were reluctant towards introducing a system with fixed compensation to increase the number of living kidney donors, still 25% of the general public reacted positively.

Keywords: economics; ethics; financial incentives; living kidney donation; paid donation; transplantation

Journal Article.  2786 words. 

Subjects: Nephrology

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.