Journal Article

Association between pre-transplant dialysis modality and patient and graft survival after kidney transplantation

Anneke Kramer, Kitty J. Jager, Damian G. Fogarty, Pietro Ravani, Patrik Finne, Jordi Pérez-Panadés, Karl G. Prütz, Manuel Arias, James G. Heaf, Christoph Wanner and Vianda S. Stel

in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Published on behalf of European Renal Association - European Dialysis and Transplant Assoc

Volume 27, issue 12, pages 4473-4480
Published in print December 2012 | ISSN: 0931-0509
Published online December 2012 | e-ISSN: 1460-2385 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfs450
Association between pre-transplant dialysis modality and patient and graft survival after kidney transplantation

Show Summary Details

Preview

Background

Previous studies have found inconsistent associations between pre-transplant dialysis modality and subsequent post-transplant survival. We aimed to examine this relationship using the instrumental variable method and to compare the results with standard Cox regression.

Methods

We included 29 088 patients (age >20 years) from 16 European national or regional renal registries who received a first kidney transplant between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2008 and were on dialysis before transplantation for a period between 90 days and 10 years. Standard multivariable Cox regression examined the association of individually assigned pre-transplant dialysis modality with post-transplant patient and graft survival. To decrease confounding-by-indication through unmeasured factors, we applied the instrumental variable method that used the case-mix adjusted centre percentage of peritoneal dialysis (PD) as predictor variable.

Results

Standard analyses adjusted for age, sex, primary renal disease, donor type, duration of dialysis, year of transplantation and country suggested that PD before transplantation was associated with better patient [hazard ratio, HR (95% CI) = 0.83 (0.76–0.91)] and graft survival (HR (95% CI) 0.90 (0.84–0.96)) when compared with haemodialysis (HD). In contrast, the instrumental variable analysis showed that a 10% increase in the case-mix adjusted centre percentage of patients on PD was neither associated with post-transplant patient survival [HR (95% CI = 1.00 (0.97–1.04)] nor with graft survival [HR (95% CI) = 1.01 (0.98–1.04)].

Conclusions

The instrumental variable method failed to confirm the associations found in standard Cox regression between pre-transplant dialysis modality and patient and graft survival after transplantation. The lack of association in instrumental variable analysis may be due to better control of residual confounding.

Keywords: confounding; dialysis; Europe; instrumental variable; kidney transplantation; survival

Journal Article.  5384 words. 

Subjects: Nephrology

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.