Article

Environmental Justice

Jason A. Byrne

in Geography

ISBN: 9780199874002
Published online February 2013 | | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199874002-0008
Environmental Justice

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Earth Sciences and Geography
  • Human Geography

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

“Environmental justice” is both a social movement and a research subject. Broadly defined, environmental justice means that all people—irrespective of race, ethnicity, class, gender, and physical ability—have the right to live in clean, healthy, and safe environments; to have equal access to safe and healthy workplaces, schools, and recreation areas; and to have access to safe and nutritious food and clean water. Environmental injustice was first recognized in the United States and has been traced to “Jim Crow” ideology. Racial segregation laws were enacted across the United States between the mid-1870s and mid-1960s, and, later, racially restrictive housing covenants, patterns of mortgage lending (redlining), and outright discrimination restricted non-whites to specific suburbs, jobs, and educational facilities. People of color (e.g., African Americans, Asians, and Latinos) typically lived near polluting factories and in substandard housing with poor-quality facilities. Similar processes and patterns occurred in Australia, Canada, and South Africa, among other countries. Formal recognition of environmental injustice began in the 1960s, when activists for environmental justice began to fight race- and class-based oppression, initially as part of the US civil-rights movement. What started as local-scale protests, where people of color and low-income earners joined together to fight against locally unwanted land uses, rapidly grew into a national social movement. During the mid-1980s, the environmental-justice movement was especially prominent in the southern United States (e.g., Mississippi, Louisiana, and Alabama). Groups of concerned citizens joined religious leaders and politicians of color to systematically document cases of disproportionate exposure to environmental harm, and fought for remediation and compensation. Such harm has included landfills, toxic waste dumps, waste incinerators, farm chemicals, lead paint in houses, industrial “cancer alleys,” uranium enrichment facilities, biotechnology labs, and even “transit racism.” The US-based movement has now expanded internationally and has adopted a set of overarching principles. Environmental inequity is emerging as a major problem in China and India. Scholars from a wide variety of disciplines, including law, sociology, public health, land-use planning, and geography, have joined activists to document injustices. Scholars have used various research techniques to prove that disproportionate exposure is real and has often been intentional. Environmental justice is different than “environmental racism,” which refers to race-based environmental inequity rather than to the interactions between race and class and how they form mutually reinforcing systems of oppression. Environmental justice is also different than “ecological justice,” which refers to the intrinsic value of nonhuman species and their right to moral considerability.

Article.  18523 words. 

Subjects: Earth Sciences and Geography ; Human Geography

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.