Overview

evidence-based decision making


Related Overviews

 

'evidence-based decision making' can also refer to...

evidence-based decision making

The Politics of Evidence-Based Decision Making

Evidence-based decision making in occupational health

Bringing shared decision making and evidence-based practice together

Evidence-based practice and decision making in psychiatric music therapy

Evidence-Based Practice in Early Childhood Music Therapy: A Decision-Making Process

Evidence-Based Practice in Social Work: Lessons from Judgment and Decision-Making Theory

Strengthening evidence-based decision-making: is it possible without improving health system stewardship?

Supporting decision-making processes for evidence-based mental health promotion

The Italian Network for Evidence Based Prevention: a new tool for decision making in Public Health Antonio Giulio de Belvis

Neural Evidence for Adaptive Strategy Selection in Value-Based Decision-Making

Why We Really Don't Care about the Evidence in Evidence-Based Decision Making in Conservation (and How to Change This)

A Randomized Effectiveness Trial of a Clinical Informatics Consult Service: Impact on Evidence-based Decision-making and Knowledge Implementation

Ten Commandments for Effective Clinical Decision Support: Making the Practice of Evidence-based Medicine a Reality

Evidence-based decision making in an endoscopy nurse with respiratory symptoms exposed to the new ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA) disinfectant

Evidence-based decision-making in child health: The role of clinical research and economic evaluation

Track B8: Workshop: Research for health and evidence-based decision making in Central Asia—a learning session

Decision Making in Oncology: Evidence-Based Management Benjamin Djulbegovic, Daniel M. Sullivan, eds. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1997, 543 pp., $79.00. ISBN 0-443-08989-2

 

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Public Health and Epidemiology

GO

Show Summary Details

Quick Reference

Logical, consistent use of the best available evidence from proven basic scientific sources, preferably augmented as necessary by facts from current verified peer-reviewed research, to inform policy decisions and routine practice. This approach to decision making ought to apply to all aspects of life, for instance, decisions in courts of law, as well as in biomedical science, medical practice, and public health. The evidence used in decision making should be systematically collected, assessed, and applied, bearing in mind the hierarchy of evidence when considering its quality, validity, and relevance. In considering evidence, the standards of proof vary and are often passionately debated. Direct observation and precise measurement are regarded as solid evidence that can provide firm proof in many circumstances. On the other hand, epidemiological evidence is mainly circumstantial, thus giving opponents of public health measures based on epidemiological evidence many opportunities to refute it. Lawyers representing the tobacco industry, for instance, have often been successful in refuting epidemiological evidence, although in recent years they have found it increasingly difficult to deny the weight of accumulated evidence that tobacco is harmful. See also Hill's criteria and logic.

Subjects: Public Health and Epidemiology.


Reference entries

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.