Overview

no evidence rule


Related Overviews

 

'no evidence rule' can also refer to...

no evidence rule

no evidence rule

Prosecutor v Rajić (Ivica), Review of the Indictment Pursuant to Rule 61 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Case No IT-95-12-R61 ICTY, ICL 60 (ICTY 1996), 13th September 1996, Trial Chamber I (ICTY)

Situation in Darfur, Prosecutor, Decision inviting observations in application of Rule 103 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Case no ICC-02/05, ICL 901 (ICC 2006), 24th July 2006, ICC Pre Trial Chamber I

Lašva Valley, Prosecutor v Blaškić (Tihomir), Decision on the Motion of the Defence Filed Pursuant to Rule 64 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Case No IT-95-14-T, ICL 13 (ICTY 1996), 3rd April 1996, Appeals Chamber (ICTY)

Bemba et al case, Prosecutor (on the application of Victims) v Bemba Gombo (Jean-Pierre) and ors, Decision on ‘Prosecution Submission of Evidence Pursuant to Rule 68(2)(c) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence’, Case no ICC-01/05-01/13, ICL 1677 (ICC 2015), 12th November 2015, International Criminal Court [ICC]; Trial Chamber VII [ICC]

Prosecutor v Ntahobali (Arséne Shalom) and ors, Decision on Ntahobali’s motion to rule inadmissible the evidence of witness TN, Case no ICTR-98-42-T, ICL 409 (ICTR 2002), 1st July 2002, Trial Chamber II (ICTR)

Sarajevo, Prosecutor v Milošević (Dragomir), Decision on Prosecution's Motion to Add a Witness and for Evidence to be Admitted Via Rule 92bis, Case No IT-98-29/1-T, ICL 512 (ICTY 2007), 14th March 2007, Trial Chamber III (ICTY)

Prosecutor v Bagosora (Théoneste), Decision on the defence motion for pre-determination of rules of evidence, Case no ICTR-96-7-T, ICL 140 (ICTR 1998), 8th July 1998, Trial Chamber II (ICTR)

Prosecutor v Bagilishema (Ignace), Decision on the request of the defence pursuant to Rule 73 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence for summons on witnesses, Case No ICTR-95-1A-T, ICL 953 (ICTR 2000), 8th June 2000, United Nations Security Council [UNSC]; International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda [ICTR]; Trial Chamber I [ICTR]

Prosecutor v Kupreškić (Zoran) and ors, Decision on the motions of Drago Josipović, Zoran Kupreškić and Vlatko Kupreškić to admit additional evidence pursuant to Rule 115 and for judicial notice to be taken pursuant to Rule 94(B), Case No IT-95-16-AR73, ICL 319 (ICTY 2001), 8th May 2001, Appeals Chamber (ICTY)

Prosecutor v Nahimana (Ferdinand), Decision on the defence's motion for the release or alternatively provisional release of Ferdinand Nahimana - Rule 65 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Case No ICTR-99-52-T, ICL 361 (ICTR 2002), 5th September 2002, Trial Chamber I (ICTR)

Prosecutor v Ntagerura (André) and ors, Decision on Ntagerura's extremely urgent motion for order to transfer an accused from the detention facility in order to testify for the defence pursuant to Rules 73 and 54 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Case no ICTR-99-46-T, ICL 407 (ICTR 2002), 16th April 2002, Trial Chamber III (ICTR)

Lašva Valley, Prosecutor v Blaškić (Tihomir), Decision on the Defence Motion for 'Sanctions for Prosecutor's Repeated Violations of Rule 68 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence', Case No IT-95-14-T ICTY, ICL 40 (ICTY 1998), 29th April 1998, Trial Chamber I (ICTY)

Prosecutor v Bagaragaza (Michel), Decision on the Prosecution Motion for Referral to the Kingdom of Norway - Rule 11bis of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Case No ICTR-2005-86-11bis, ICL 499 (ICTR 2006), 19th May 2006, Trial Chamber III (ICTR)

Prosecutor v Bagaragaza (Michel), Decision on Prosecutor's Request for Referral of the Indictment to the Netherlands - Rule 11bis of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Case No ICTR-2005-86-11bis, ICL 500 (ICTR 2007), 13th April 2007, Trial Chamber III (ICTR)

Prosecutor v Munyakazi (Yussuf), Decision on the Prosecutor's Request for Referral of Case to the Republic of Rwanda - Rule 11bis of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Case No ICTR-97-36-R11bis, ICL 636 (ICTR 2008), 28th May 2008, Trial Chamber III (ICTR)

Prosecutor v Bucyibaruta (Laurent), Decision on prosecutor’s request for referral of Laurent Bucyibaruta’s indictment to France, Rule 11 bis of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Case No ICTR-2005-85-1, ICL 718 (ICTR 2007), 20th November 2007, International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda [ICTR]

Prosecutor v Karemera (Édouard), Decision on the defence motion, pursuant to Rule 72 of Rules of Procedure and Evidence, pertaining to, inter alia, lack of jurisdiction and defects in the form of the indictment, Case No ICTR-98-44-T, ICL 838 (ICTR 2001), 25th April 2001, Trial Chamber II (ICTR)

 

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Law

GO

Show Summary Details

Quick Reference

The principle that a person whose interests have suffered detriment because a decision was improperly made without probative evidence will be entitled to judicial review under the rules of procedural ...

Subjects: Law.


Reference entries

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.