Overview

randomized response


Related Overviews

 

'randomized response' can also refer to...

randomized response

randomized response

randomized response n.

randomized response n.

Representing Response Times as Random Variables

Magnetotelluric response of a randomly layered earth

A Randomized Response Approach to Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation

Measuring Voter Turnout By Using The Randomized Response Technique Evidence Calling Into Question The Method’s Validity

Response to Letter: Randomized Trial of Weight Loss and Total Mortality

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Intervention by Interactive Voice Response

Randomized Trial of Different Screening Strategies for Colorectal Cancer: Patient Response and Detection Rates

RESPONSE: Re: Selenium Supplementation and Secondary Prevention of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer in a Randomized Trial

RESPONSE: Re: Role of Detection Method in Predicting Breast Cancer Survival: Analysis of Randomized Screening Trials

Response: Re: Conjugated Equine Estrogen and Risk of Benign Proliferative Breast Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Response: Re: Promoting Regular Mammography Screening I. A Systematic Assessment of Validity in a Randomized Trial

Response: Re: Racial Disparities in Cancer Survival Among Randomized Clinical Trials of the Southwest Oncology Group

Response: Re: Sunscreen Use and Duration of Sun Exposure: a Double-Blind, Randomized Trial

Response - Re: Quality of Life in Advanced Prostate Cancer: Results of a Randomized Therapeutic Trial

Response More About: Sunscreen Use and Duration of Sun Exposure: a Double-Blind, Randomized Trial

 

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Psychology

GO

Show Summary Details

Quick Reference

A technique designed to reduce or eliminate evasive response bias in survey research on sensitive issues by preserving respondent confidentiality through randomization. For example, an investigator might instruct the respondents as follows: Toss a coin privately and then answer Yes if either your coin fell heads or you have smoked cannabis, otherwise answer No. With a sample size of 1,000, we would expect 500 Yes replies if none of the respondents had smoked cannabis; additional Yes responses would suggest that some respondents whose coins fell tails also replied Yes, and the proportion who had smoked cannabis could be estimated from the results without identifying the individuals concerned. If 580 answered Yes, then we might assume that approximately 80 of the 500 whose coins fell tails answered Yes, and we could therefore estimate the proportion of the population who have smoked cannabis to be 80/500 = 16 per cent, and this conclusion could be reached without having identified any individual cannabis smokers. The technique was first proposed by the US economist Stanley Leon Warner (1928–92) in an article in the Journal of the American Statistical Association in 1965. See also non-reactive measure, reactivity.

Subjects: Psychology.


Reference entries

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.