trial by battle

Show Summary Details

Quick Reference

Before the Norman Conquest, guilt or innocence in legal disputes were decided by compurgation, where a party would summon a number of ‘oath helpers’ to swear to the reliability of his oath, or especially in cases of ‘criminal’ accusation by one of the ordeals, fire, cold water, hot water, or accursed morsel (see trial by ordeal). To these methods the Normans, with their strong militaristic tradition, added trial by battle. The parties, or champions on their behalf, would fight in formal single combat and the winner would be deemed to be the successful party in the case. It was not abolished until 1819, after the accused was challenged to combat in the case of Ashford v. Thornton.

Subjects: Law — British History.

Reference entries

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.