Article

Why There Is (as Yet) No Such Thing as an Economics of Knowledge

Philip Mirowski

in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics

Published in print March 2009 | ISBN: 9780195189254
Published online September 2009 | | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195189254.003.0005

Series: Oxford Handbooks in Philosophy

 Why There Is (as Yet) No Such Thing as an Economics of Knowledge

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Philosophy
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Epistemology

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

Once upon a time, say around the era of David Ricardo and Karl Marx, political economy was primarily concerned with the production of national wealth. This “classical” notion tended to hang on long into the twentieth century, well after the invention of neoclassical economics in the 1870s. Nevertheless, there was no denying that within neoclassical economics, exchange had displaced production as the primary topic of interest. But subsequently, something rather extraordinary happened around the middle of the twentieth century, gaining momentum as the century waned. More and more, economics at the cutting edge became relatively cavalier about treating trade as static allocation. This article endeavors to point out that all major existing modern traditions of the Economics of Knowledge have encountered their comeuppance solely from within, leading various economists to concede that their own constructions of the epistemology of the agent were structurally incoherent.

Keywords: David Ricardo; Karl Marx; political economy; national wealth; Economics of Knowledge

Article.  27592 words. 

Subjects: Philosophy ; Philosophy of Science ; Epistemology

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.