Article

The Alleged Act Requirement in Criminal Law

Douglas N. Husak

in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Criminal Law

Published in print August 2011 | ISBN: 9780195314854
Published online September 2011 | | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195314854.003.0004

Series: Oxford Handbooks

 The Alleged Act Requirement in Criminal Law

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Philosophy
  • Philosophy of Law

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

This chapter begins with some remarks about what it would mean for the criminal law to contain an act requirement, and then moves on to how this question, suitably clarified, might be approached. Given the views about what the question means and how one should approach it, it contends that the criminal law does not contain an act requirement but something easily confused with it. The discussion concludes by speculating about why so many distinguished penal theorists mistakenly believe that criminal law contains an act requirement. Perhaps the main practical function of the act requirement is to bar punishment in those relatively unusual cases of strict criminal liability.

Keywords: criminal law; act requirement; penal theorists; criminal liability

Article.  9678 words. 

Subjects: Philosophy ; Philosophy of Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.