Article

Donne's Absolutism

Debora Shuger

in The Oxford Handbook of John Donne

Published in print February 2011 | ISBN: 9780199218608
Published online September 2012 | | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199218608.013.0057

Series: Oxford Handbooks of Literature

 Donne's Absolutism

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Literature
  • Literary Studies (1500 to 1800)
  • Literary Studies (Poetry and Poets)

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

Donne's idea of absolutism is the essence of this article. Like many questions, that of Donne's absolutism hinges on definition. If one adopts the strong version favoured by Glen Burgess and Conrad Russel, for whom it means royal legislative sovereignty — the position that the king can himself make law and impose taxes without Parliament — then it seems unlikely Donne was an absolutist. Absolutism so defined attracted little support in early Stuart England; even James abjured it once south of the border. Yet it is scarcely a non-issue in Donne criticism, where ‘absolutism’ has been a fighting word since 1981, when John Carey invoked ‘Donne, the absolutist’, echoed two years later by Jonathan Goldberg. In turning to the question of Donne's absolutism, one needs to keep in mind both that the relevant distinctions are often between shades of grey and also that against certain backgrounds some shades of grey clash.

Keywords: Donne; absolutism; Jonathan Goldberg; John Carrey; Donne's absolutism; Stuart England

Article.  6905 words. 

Subjects: Literature ; Literary Studies (1500 to 1800) ; Literary Studies (Poetry and Poets)

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.