Article

Standards of Treatment

Todd J. Grierson-Weiler and Ian A. Laird

in The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law

Published in print June 2008 | ISBN: 9780199231386
Published online September 2012 | | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199231386.013.0008

Series: Oxford Handbooks in Law

 Standards of Treatment

Show Summary Details

Preview

Today, international investment law arbitrations include claims for two broad categories of state responsibility: nondiscrimination and fair and equitable treatment. It is these two categories of treatment owed by states to investors to which this article is devoted. A recent bilateral investment treaty award, Saluka v Czech Republic, may be demonstrative of this trend. Saluka was a classical non-discrimination award that was not based upon a non-discrimination provision, such as national treatment, because one was missing from the treaty. The tribunal based its findings for the successful claimant upon the treaty's minimum standard of treatment provision instead. The goal of this article is merely to note that, as a matter of doctrine, it is becoming increasingly difficult to discern any difference between the ways in which non-discrimination and minimum standard provisions are actually being interpreted and applied.

Keywords: international investment law; equitable treatment; Saluka v Czech Republic; non-discrimination award; doctrine; minimum standard provisions

Article.  23069 words. 

Subjects: Law ; International Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.